{"id":3645,"date":"2026-10-15T15:48:04","date_gmt":"2026-10-15T07:48:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.hewilson.com\/blog\/?p=3645"},"modified":"2026-10-15T15:48:04","modified_gmt":"2026-10-15T07:48:04","slug":"are-there-any-insurance-options-for-automation-components-48a4-4a8215","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.hewilson.com\/blog\/2026\/10\/15\/are-there-any-insurance-options-for-automation-components-48a4-4a8215\/","title":{"rendered":"Are there any insurance options for automation components?"},"content":{"rendered":"

When I started my automation components supply business 12 years ago, I thought the biggest challenges would be sourcing reliable parts at fair prices and keeping up with the rapid pace of technological change in industrial automation. What I didn\u2019t expect was how many of my clients would ask, in those early meetings, \u201cWhat happens if one of these components fails unexpectedly? Who covers the cost when a critical part brings our entire production line to a halt?\u201d Automation Components<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

At first, I struggled to answer that question clearly. Back then, specialized insurance for automation components felt like a niche, underdeveloped space\u2014something only the largest industrial conglomerates had easy access to. As a small-to-mid-sized supplier, I often had to direct my clients to general business insurance policies that just didn\u2019t cover the specific risks tied to the parts I sold them. Over time, though, the landscape has shifted dramatically. Today, there are meaningful insurance options tailored to automation components, and as someone who works closely with manufacturers, plant managers, and system integrators every day, I\u2019ve seen how these policies can make the difference between a manageable hiccup and a costly business crisis.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s start with the most common risk I hear about from clients: catastrophic failure of a critical automation component. Take a packaging plant I worked with last year. A motor drive we\u2019d supplied for their primary line failed without warning at 2 a.m., halfway through a 24-hour production run. The part cost around $1,200 to replace, but the real damage was lost output: they had to shut down for 36 hours, missing a contract deadline that cost them $45,000 in penalties. Their general business policy covered the cost of a temporary rental drive, but not the lost production revenue or the penalty fees. That\u2019s the gap specialized component insurance fills.<\/p>\n

There are two primary types of policies most relevant to automation component users, and they can be structured to work for both buyers and suppliers like me. The first is \u201cproduct liability insurance with specialized industrial coverage.\u201d Standard product liability covers injuries or property damage caused by a defective product, but it often excludes the kind of indirect losses that hit industrial automation operations hardest\u2014lost productivity, downtime, contractual penalties, and even lost business from customers. Specialized policies adjust that coverage to include these specific risks. For example, a policy might cover the cost of rush replacement parts, overtime for technicians to install them, and the revenue lost from a line shutdown, up to a pre-agreed limit.<\/p>\n

The second key option is \u201ccomponent breakdown insurance,\u201d sometimes called \u201cmachinery breakdown insurance\u201d with a targeted add-on for automation parts. This is different from the general machinery coverage most plants carry, which usually covers mechanical wear and tear over time. Component breakdown insurance is designed for the high-performance, often custom-built automation parts that are core to modern manufacturing\u2014think PLCs (Programmable Logic Controllers), robotic end effectors, sensor arrays, and high-torque motor drives. These parts operate in harsh environments: extreme temperatures, dust, vibration, and constant use, all of which can cause failure even if they\u2019re installed and maintained correctly. This policy covers the cost of repairing or replacing the failed component, as well as the associated downtime, without requiring proof that the part was defective. That\u2019s a big benefit, because proving manufacturing defect in a complex automation component can take weeks of testing and arbitration\u2014time most plants don\u2019t have when a line is down.<\/p>\n

As a supplier, I\u2019ve also learned that there are insurance options tailored specifically for component vendors like me, which can in turn make my clients more comfortable working with us. \u201cProducts and completed operations insurance for industrial components\u201d is a policy that covers my business if a part I supplied causes damage to another component, or leads to a failure that my client can\u2019t recover from. For example, if a faulty sensor I sold triggered a wrong signal that caused a robotic arm to collide with another machine, damaging both the arm and the line\u2019s controller, this policy would cover the cost of the damaged parts and any related downtime. Even though I stand behind every component I sell with a 12-month warranty, these policies add an extra layer of protection for my clients that builds long-term trust.<\/p>\n

That said, not all insurance options are created equal, and I\u2019ve seen clients make costly mistakes by choosing a policy that\u2019s not tailored to their specific automation setup. The biggest mistake I see is buying a one-size-fits-all machinery policy that doesn\u2019t account for custom or highly specialized components. For example, a food processing plant that uses custom vision systems for quality control can be left underinsured if their policy only covers standard off-the-shelf motors. Custom components often have higher replacement costs, and the downtime they cause can be more impactful because they\u2019re tied to a unique production process. Another mistake is not accounting for \u201chidden\u201d downtime costs. A lot of managers only calculate the cost of the part itself, but rush shipping for a critical component can cost 5 or 10 times the part\u2019s price, and the overtime for technicians to work after hours or on weekends adds up quickly. A good specialized insurance policy will outline all these eligible costs upfront, so there are no surprises when a claim is filed.<\/p>\n

Over the years, I\u2019ve worked with dozens of clients to navigate these insurance options, and I\u2019ve picked up a few key tips that I always share. First, get your components\u2019 specifications in order before talking to insurance providers. Automation parts have unique model numbers, operating speeds, environmental ratings, and application contexts\u2014all of which affect risk. A sensor designed for a clean, room-temperature assembly line has a very different risk profile than one designed for a 120-degree die-casting plant. Having clear documentation on each component you use, including installation dates, maintenance logs, and expected operating lifespan, will make it much easier to get a policy that fits. Second, don\u2019t overlook the value of bundled policies. Many insurance providers now offer packages that combine component coverage, cyber risk coverage (a huge one for automation systems that rely on connected software), and business interruption coverage into a single plan. Cyber risk is particularly important now, as more automation components are connected to Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) networks\u2014a software glitch or a cyberattack can cause downtime just as quickly as a mechanical failure, and many older policies don\u2019t cover that.<\/p>\n

Let me also address a concern I hear from smaller businesses, which are often the ones most vulnerable to downtime costs: insurance for automation components is more accessible and affordable now than it was even five years ago. Five years ago, many providers wouldn\u2019t offer coverage for small businesses with less than 50 employees, but the growing demand from small and mid-sized manufacturers has pushed insurers to create tiered policies with lower minimum coverage limits. I helped a client last year who runs a 10-person woodworking shop, which uses custom CNC routers from several suppliers. They had been self-insuring for component failures, and a single shutdown a year earlier had cost them $18,000 in lost work. We worked with a provider to get a small-scale component breakdown policy that cost them less than $2,000 a year, and when a router\u2019s servo motor failed six months later, the policy covered the $3,500 part cost, $1,200 in rush shipping, and the $12,000 in lost production time. That\u2019s a return on investment I don\u2019t think I\u2019d seen documented as clearly just a few years prior.<\/p>\n

Of course, insurance isn\u2019t a replacement for good maintenance and high-quality components. As a supplier, I always tell my clients that the first line of defense is buying from reputable vendors, like us, who offer transparent warranties and rigorous testing for every part. But even the highest-quality component can fail unexpectedly, and when that happens, having the right insurance can mean the difference between a small setback and a crisis that puts you out of business for weeks.<\/p>\n

For anyone who\u2019s still unsure whether this kind of insurance is worth the investment, let me put it in terms I\u2019ve used with dozens of plant managers: when you invest in an automation component that costs tens of thousands of dollars, and that\u2019s core to your production, it only makes sense to protect that investment the same way you\u2019d protect any other high-value business asset. I\u2019ve seen clients delay adopting new automation technology because they were worried about the risks of downtime, only to realize that a simple insurance policy removed that barrier. Now, many of those same clients upgrade their automation systems every few years, and they factor insurance into their total cost of ownership for each new component\u2014something I wish more businesses did early on.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

If you\u2019re a plant manager, system integrator, or business owner who works with automation components, and you\u2019re not sure if the insurance you have covers the specific risks you face, I encourage you to reach out to us to discuss your needs. We\u2019ve spent years partnering with insurance providers and refining our recommendations for clients, and we can help you navigate the options that fit your specific setup, whether you\u2019re a small business just getting started with automation or a large manufacturer with a full line of robotic systems. We don\u2019t just sell components\u2014we work with our clients to ensure their operations run smoothly, and part of that is making sure they\u2019re protected when the unexpected happens.<\/p>\n

\n

Automation Components<\/a> References
\nIndustrial Automation and Control Association. (2022). Risk Management Guidelines for Industrial Automation Systems.
\nNational Association of Manufacturers. (2023). Insurance Options for Small and Medium Manufacturers.
\nSociety of Automotive Engineers. (2021). Component Failure Risks in Connected Automation Systems.
\nInsurance Information Institute. (2023). Machinery and Component Breakdown Coverage Guide.<\/p>\n

\n

Sango Automation Limited<\/a>
Sango Automation Limited is well-known as one of the leading automation components manufacturers and suppliers in China for 10 years. Our factory offers high quality automation components made in China with competitive price. Welcome to contact us for wholesale service.
Address: F3, Bld3, Huanrong Tech Park, No. 1 Baima Xianfeng 2nd Road, Nancheng Street, Dongguan, Guangdong, 523106,China
E-mail: marketing@sango-automation.com
WebSite: https:\/\/www.sango-automation.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

When I started my automation components supply business 12 years ago, I thought the biggest challenges … Are there any insurance options for automation components?<\/span>Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":524,"featured_media":3645,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3608],"class_list":["post-3645","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industry","tag-automation-components-4a4b-4ab7b2"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.hewilson.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3645","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.hewilson.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.hewilson.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.hewilson.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/524"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.hewilson.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3645"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.hewilson.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3645\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.hewilson.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3645"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.hewilson.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3645"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.hewilson.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3645"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.hewilson.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3645"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}